Log inRequest demo
Log inRequest demo
Back to Solutions

Find and stop real phishing attacks

Exaforce intelligently triages and investigates phishing incidents, cutting through the noise to instantly highlight credible threats with the full context.

Request demo
A reported phishing email triaged in Exaforce, showing the summary, a benign high-confidence conclusion, and three of three workflows completed.

Challenges with email security

  1. Analyst overload from phishing alerts

    Security teams face a constant flood of reported phishing emails, overwhelming analysts with repetitive investigations that slow response times and increase burnout.

  2. Increased sophistication of attacks

    AI-driven attackers are crafting increasingly complex campaigns with malicious links, weaponized attachments, and spoofed senders that evade traditional gateways and directly target users.

  3. Unclear blast radius and impact

    Security teams often struggle to determine the full scope of a reported phishing event, including which users were affected, what access they had, which systems were involved, and what data may be at risk.

  4. Fragmented investigations

    Validating a phishing alert frequently requires correlating email signals with endpoint detections, SaaS activity, and identity logs, forcing analysts to pivot across multiple systems instead of seeing the full picture in one place.

Exaforce instantly triages and accelerates phishing investigations

Reduced phishing overload

Exaforce reduces the manual burden by automatically triaging and enriching reported phishing alerts, cutting noise, and letting teams focus on the threats that matter.

Stay ahead of evolving attacks

Exaforce ingests raw email logs, headers, and HTML to capture full click-path evidence, identify malicious URLs, and render embedded links so analysts can quickly confirm whether the emails are malicious or spoofed.

Automated impact analysis

Exaforce automatically traces other impacted users, user activity, access permissions, and data access to map the impact of a phishing event, giving analysts clear visibility into affected users, systems, and data.

See the full attack path

Exaforce correlates email alerts with endpoint, SaaS, and identity signals into a unified investigation, eliminating tool-hopping and accelerating response.

Fuze

GuardDuty alerts used to eat up hours of our team’s time. With Exaforce MDR, that dropped to almost zero. We’re not just getting alerts, we’re getting answers.

Srijan R Shetty

Co-Founder & CTO at Fuze

Read case study

Frequently asked questions

Does Exaforce replace email security gateways?
No, Exaforce complements rather than replaces email security gateways. Your existing email gateway provides critical first-line defense by blocking known threats, enforcing SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies, and filtering spam before delivery. Exaforce adds value by triaging and investigating emails that bypass gateway protections and reach user inboxes, analyzing user-reported phishing that requires human review, correlating email threats with post-delivery activity across endpoint, identity, and cloud systems, and automating response workflows including mailbox remediation and credential rotation. This layered approach maintains gateway protection while adding AI-powered investigation and response capabilities that gateways fundamentally lack.
How does Exaforce correlate email threats with activity across other systems?
Phishing attacks rarely end with the email itself but instead serve as the initial vector for broader compromise. Traditional email security tools operate in isolation and miss these multi-stage attacks. Exaforce correlates phishing indicators with endpoint activity like malware execution following attachment downloads or suspicious process launches after link clicks, identity provider logs showing credential harvesting attempts or unusual authentication patterns, SaaS application access revealing unauthorized data access or sharing following compromise, and cloud platform activity indicating lateral movement or privilege escalation using stolen credentials. The Semantic Model resolves identities across all systems while the Knowledge Model reconstructs complete attack timelines from initial phishing email through subsequent compromise stages, exposing the full attack path that fragmented tools cannot see.
How does Exaforce detect sophisticated phishing attacks that bypass email gateways?
Modern attackers craft increasingly sophisticated campaigns using AI-generated content, spoofed trusted senders, malicious links hidden behind legitimate redirects, and weaponized attachments that evade signature-based detection. Exaforce detects these evolved threats by analyzing complete email structure including headers, HTML rendering, and embedded resources rather than relying solely on subject lines or sender reputation, following URL redirect chains to expose final malicious destinations hidden behind legitimate services, correlating email characteristics with behavioral patterns like unusual sender-recipient relationships or atypical content for that sender, and cross-referencing with identity and SaaS activity to detect successful credential harvesting or account compromise following phishing attempts. This multi-layered analysis catches sophisticated attacks that traditional email security gateways miss.
How does Exaforce reduce the manual burden of phishing investigations?
Security teams face overwhelming volumes of reported phishing emails, with analysts spending hours manually investigating each submission to determine legitimacy. Exaforce automates phishing triage by ingesting raw email logs, headers, and HTML content, analyzing sender authenticity, embedded URLs, and attachment characteristics, correlating reported emails with threat intelligence and past campaigns, and rendering embedded links to capture click-path evidence without manual interaction. Exabots automatically classify emails as Needs Investigation, Benign, or False Positive with supporting evidence and clear disposition recommendations. This reduces the manual investigation burden by 70-80%, allowing analysts to focus only on confirmed threats requiring human judgment rather than spending hours on repetitive email validation.

Related resources